Taketo Takamisawa vs Naoki Nakagawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Naoki Nakagawa excels on their second serve, winning 48.77% of points, outpacing Taketo Takamisawa who has managed 43.48% in recent months. Does superior second-serve performance imply a potential advantage for Nakagawa? Yes, it often correlates with match success.
• Return Game Strength: Taketo Takamisawa leads in returning second serves, capturing 43.81% of opponent points, compared to Nakagawa's 41.36%. Similarly, Takamisawa also outperforms on first serve returns with 28.88% against Nakagawa's 23.02%. Could Takamisawa's return skills give him an edge? Possibly, especially in breaking serves.
• Handling Pressure: When under pressure, Nakagawa has a slight edge, saving 54.35% of breakpoints, whereas Takamisawa saves 46.81%. Does better breakpoint saving translate into match resilience for Nakagawa? It can be pivotal during crucial moments.
• Overall Win Rate: Takamisawa holds a higher win rate over the past year at 56.67%, compared to Nakagawa's 43.18%. Does this indicate Takamisawa's overall consistency? Yes, particularly in match outcomes.
• Surface Preference: Nakagawa performs best on I.hard surfaces with a 61% win rate, while struggling more on Hard courts. Conversely, Takamisawa prefers Hard courts, also boasting a 61% win rate, yet fairs poorly on I.hard. Could the match surface impact their performance? Certainly, surface suitability can influence the outcome.
• Competitive Level: Nakagawa has competed primarily in Challengers/ITF > $10K, winning 34.48% of matches. Takamisawa, focusing on the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K, has won 56.67%, a clear indication of more success at his competition level.
• Direct Head-to-Head: Nakagawa has won the sole encounter between the two, triumphing in both sets played. Does this historical win boost Nakagawa's confidence? Past victories often bolster morale and strategy insights.
• Opponent Quality: In terms of opponent ranking, Nakagawa faces tougher competition with an average rank of 458.11, while Takamisawa competes against an average 224.43 ranking. Does this suggest Nakagawa's adaptation to more challenging opponents? It could mean readiness for higher-tier matches.
• Deciding Set Performance: Takamisawa prevails in deciding sets 50% of the time, surpassing Nakagawa's 30% success rate. Could Takamisawa handle tighter situations better? His record suggests he might.

Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):

As we evaluate recent performances, Naoki Nakagawa demonstrates considerable strength in second-serve points and handling pressure during breakpoints. Meanwhile, Taketo Takamisawa excels in return games and has a higher win rate over the past year.

Despite Nakagawa's previous triumph in their last head-to-head match, the surface of play may influence the game's dynamics as Takamisawa favors Hard courts, similar to the current setting. Moreover, Takamisawa's ability to perform under tight conditions during deciding sets could be an asset should the match extend.

Given the data and performance trends, while Nakagawa boasts superior second-serve stats and breakpoint handling, Takamisawa's consistency in winning percentage, surface preference, and adept return game may give him the slight upper hand.

Considering all factors, Taketo Takamisawa appears slightly more likely to win this upcoming match.